Die Prüfungsmaterialien zur Swift CSP-Assessor von Pass4Test sind kostengünstig. Wir bieten den Kandidaten die Simulationsfragen und Antworten von guter Qualität mit niedrigem Preis. Wir hoffen herzlich, dass Sie die Prüfung bestehen können. Außerdem bieten wir Ihen bequemen Online-Service und alle Ihren Fragen zur Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung lösen.
| Thema | Einzelheiten |
|---|---|
| Thema 1 |
|
| Thema 2 |
|
| Thema 3 |
|
>> CSP-Assessor Online Prüfung <<
Pass4Test hat die spezielle Schulungsunterlagen zur Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung. Sie können mit wenig Zeit und Geld Ihre IT-Fachkenntnisse in kurzer Zeit verbessern und somit Ihre Fachkenntnisse und Technik in der IT-Branche beweisen. Die Kurse von Pass4Test werden von den Experten nach ihren Kenntnissen und Erfahrungen für die Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung bearbeitet
25. Frage
Is it necessary to formally explain to the Swift user the testing methodology that will be used for the CSP assessment during the kick-off?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
This question concerns the assessor's obligations during the CSP assessment kick-off:
* Step 1: CSP Assessment Process
* The IAF recommends a kick-off meeting to align expectations between the assessor and SWIFT user, including explaining the testing methodology (e.g., HLTP, sampling, evidence collection).
26. Frage
The outsourcing agent of the SWIFT user provided them with an independent assessment report covering the CSP components in their scope, and using the latest CSCF version for testing. Is it enough to support the CSP attestation for the outsourced components? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
*CSCF Assessment Completion Letter
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The "Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025" and "Independent Assessment Framework" address reliance on outsourcing agents' assessments. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Yes, after confirmation and validation of the scope
This is correct. The SWIFT user can rely on the outsourcing agent's independent assessment report if it covers the relevant CSP components and uses the latest CSCF version. However, the user's assessor must confirm and validate the scope and findings to ensure alignment with the user's attestation, as per the "Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines."
*Option B: Yes, only if the outsourcing agent is a global trusted provider and published the report on their compliance portal This is incorrect. The CSP does not require the outsourcing agent to be a "global trusted provider" or publish the report publicly; validation by the user's assessor is sufficient.
*Option C: No, an audit report (and not an assessment) is required from the outsourcing agent as an external provider This is incorrect. An independent assessment report is acceptable, not necessarily an audit report, as long as it meets CSCF standards, per the "Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025."
*Option D: No, except if the cloud provider components are partially covered by the SWIFT Alliance Connect Virtual programme This is incorrect. The Alliance Connect Virtual programme's coverage is irrelevant; the key is the report's validity and scope validation.
Summary of Correct answer:
The report is sufficient after confirmation and validation of the scope (A).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025: Allows reliance on agent assessments.
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines: Requires scope validation.
*Swift_CSP_Assessment_Report_Template: Supports integrated reporting.
========
27. Frage
As a Swift CSP Certified Assessor, I left the listed provider and started to work independently. Can I continue to perform CSP assessments?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
This question addresses the eligibility of a SWIFT CSP Certified Assessor who leaves a listed provider to continue performing assessments independently:
* Step 1: SWIFT CSP Assessor Certification Rules
* The SWIFT CSP Independent Assessment Framework (IAF) specifies that assessors must be certified and affiliated with a SWIFT-approved provider listed in the Directory of CSP Assessment Providers. Certification is tied to the individual but exercised through the provider's accreditation.
* Step 2: Impact of Leaving a Provider
* When an assessor leaves a listed provider, they lose the organizational backing required to conduct official CSP assessments. The IAF states that "assessments must be performed by approved providers," and independent operation without SWIFT's formal re-approval or affiliation with another provider is not permitted, even during the certification validity period.
28. Frage
A Swift user relies on a sFTP server to connect through an externally exposed connection with a service provider or a group hub What architecture type is the Swift user? (Choose all that apply.)
Antwort: B,D
Begründung:
The Swift Customer Security Programme (CSP) defines specific architecture types in itsCustomer Security Controls Framework (CSCF)documentation to classify how Swift users connect to the Swift network. These architecture types help determine the applicable security controls based on the user's connectivity and infrastructure setup. The architecture types relevant to this question-A1, A2, A3, and A4-are outlined in the CSCF v2024(and prior versions like CSCF v2023), which is the latest framework as of March 06, 2025, unless superseded by a newer release.
Step 1: Understand the Scenario
The question specifies that the Swift user relies on ansFTP server(Secure File Transfer Protocol) to connect through anexternally exposed connectionwith aservice provider or a group hub. This implies that the user' s Swift environment involves external connectivity, potentially managed by a third party (service provider) or a centralized entity (group hub), rather than a fully self-managed, local setup.
Step 2: Define Swift Architecture Types
According to theSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF)and supporting documentation (e.g., Swift Customer Security Programme - Architecture Types Explained), the architecture types are categorized as follows:
* A1: Messaging Interface Only (Local Deployment)
* The user operates a local Swift messaging interface (e.g., Alliance Access/Entry) with no external connectivity to a service provider or hub.
* Connectivity to Swift is direct and locally managed.
* A2: Messaging Interface with Connectivity Service (External Connectivity)
* The user operates a local Swift messaging interface but connects to Swift via anexternally provided connectivity service(e.g., through a service provider or third-party connection).
* The connection point is exposed externally to the service provider.
* A3: Hosted Messaging Interface
* The Swift messaging interface itself is hosted externally by a service provider, and the user accesses it remotely (e.g., via a browser or client application).
* No local messaging interface exists at the user's site.
* A4: Group Hub or Shared Connectivity
* The user connects to Swift via agroup hubor shared infrastructure operated by a parent entity, affiliate, or third-party provider.
* This may involve centralized messaging and connectivity services shared across multiple entities.
Step 3: Analyze the Scenario Against Architecture Types
* sFTP Server Usage: The use of an sFTP server suggests a file transfer mechanism, commonly employed in Swift environments to exchange payment messages or files with external parties (e.g., service providers or hubs). This aligns with scenarios where connectivity extends beyond the user's local environment.
* Externally Exposed Connection: The phrase "externally exposed connection" indicates that the Swift user's infrastructure interfaces with an external entity (service provider or group hub), ruling out a fully self-contained setup.
* Service Provider or Group Hub:
* Aservice providertypically implies a third-party entity managing connectivity or hosting services, which could align withA2(external connectivity) orA3(hosted interface).
* Agroup hubsuggests a shared infrastructure within a corporate group or consortium, pointing towardA4.
Step 4: Match to Architecture Types
* A1: Does not apply. A1 requires a fully local deployment with no external connectivity reliance. The externally exposed sFTP connection contradicts this.
* A2: Applies. If the Swift user maintains a local messaging interface (e.g., Alliance Access) and uses the sFTP server to connect to a service provider's external infrastructure, this fits A2. The "externally exposed connection" aligns with A2's requirement of relying on an external connectivity service.
* A3: Unlikely, but possible with clarification. A3 involves a fully hosted messaging interface (e.g., no local Alliance software). The question does not explicitly state that the messaging interface is hosted externally, only that an sFTP server is used for connectivity. Without evidence of a hosted interface, A3 is not a strong fit.
* A4: Applies if a group hub is involved. If the sFTP server connects to a centralized group hub (e.g., a shared Swift infrastructure within a corporate group), this matches A4. The "group hub" reference in the question supports this possibility.
Step 5: Conclusion and Verification
Based on theCSCF v2024architecture definitions and theSwift CSP Architecture Types Explainedguidance:
* A2is confirmed because the sFTP server and externally exposed connection suggest reliance on a service provider for connectivity, with a local messaging interface assumed unless otherwise specified.
* A4is also applicable if the "group hub" scenario is active, indicating shared connectivity infrastructure.
* The question asks to "choose all that apply," and since it specifies "service providerorgroup hub," both A2 and A4 are valid depending on the context. However, A2 is the most universally applicable based on the sFTP and external connection details, with A4 as an additional fit for group hub cases.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Section: Architecture Types.
* Swift Customer Security Programme - Architecture Types Explained, available via Swift's official documentation portal (swift.com).
* Swift CSP FAQ, clarifying connectivity and hosting scenarios.
29. Frage
The Alliance Web Platform Administrator uses both the GUI and command line to perform configuration and monitoring tasks on AWP SE.
Antwort: A
Begründung:
This question pertains to the Alliance Web Platform (AWP) Single Edition (SE) Administrator's capabilities:
* Step 1: AWP SE Overview
* AWP SE is a web-based interface for managing SWIFT services (e.g., Alliance Lite2, monitoring tools). It's primarily GUI-driven, unlike Alliance Access, which supports command-line operations.
30. Frage
......
Die Produkte von Pass4Test werden von den erfahrungsreichen IT-Fachleuten nach ihren Kenntnissen und Erfahrungen bearbeitet. Wenn Sie sich an der Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung beteiligen wollen, wählen Sie doch Pass4Test. Pass4Test bietet Ihnen umfassende Prüfungsmaterialien von guter Qualität, so dass Sie sich besser auf die fachliche Swift CSP-Assessor Prüfung vorbereiten und das CSP-Assessor Zertifikat erhalten.
CSP-Assessor Übungsmaterialien: https://www.pass4test.de/CSP-Assessor.html
Copyright © 2025 DEVWORLD, MicroLearn
